# EDU-MAT-201 — learner workbook

Course: Mathematics for IT Lecturers
Version: 1.0.0 | Public pilot | 1 November 2026

## Before starting

Record your interpreter/compiler or editor version, access needs and prior experience. Use fictional data. This file is a local workbook, not an LMS submission or grade record.

## Evidence map

| Outcome | Artifact | Module | Acceptance |
|---|---|---|---|
| LO-01 | Truth table, counterexample and repaired rule | Module 1 | Module lab acceptance and capstone rubric |
| LO-02 | Annotated vector transformation and invariant check | Module 2 | Module lab acceptance and capstone rubric |
| LO-03 | Frequency table and explained posterior probability | Module 3 | Module lab acceptance and capstone rubric |
| LO-04 | A diagnostic-led mini-lesson and moderated mathematics assessment | Module 4 | Capstone rubric |

## Repeat for each module

- My prediction and its reasoning:
- Command or editorial action performed:
- Actual result and environment/source version:
- Difference from the expected result:
- Controlled defect and how it was detected:
- Correction and recheck:
- Evidence filename and private storage location:
- Assistance received and fresh transfer evidence:
- One teaching misconception and feedback response:

## Capstone brief

Teach a 20-minute lesson on interpreting a positive screening result using a fictional population. Provide both a frequency table and a probability derivation; diagnose confusion between sensitivity and the probability of a condition after a positive result. Add one transfer problem with different prevalence and a transparent partial-credit rubric.

## Self-review

Score each criterion 0–4: correctness (30%), role performance (25%), verification (20%), accessibility (15%), handover (10%). Weighted score = sum(weight × level / 4). Pilot threshold: 75/100, correctness and verification at least level 3, critical conditions resolved. An authorized assessor must confirm formal results.

Critical condition: Incorrect denominators or a worked solution that conflicts with the stated assumptions must be corrected.

## Handover and cleanup

Confirm the assessor and approved private submission channel before sending evidence. Remove faulty release copies, temporary files and unnecessary personal information. Record unresolved issues, the next action and your review date.